Differing perspectives
In the embers of the Drimp Administration's violent fall from power, among the political class of the Central Kafrican populous the concept of an elected head of state became a question to the minority. The power struggle that ensued had been blamed on the political system, that of the armed forces pledging loyalty to a politically elected figure as well as the founding constitution of the union. Quietly and underground a movement began to form in the waking hours of 2206, a movement spread through the fires of factories in Kafrican lands, fires brought about by the bombs of Zokesia.
There must be a better way, was a thought upon the minds of many in the minority of the political class, none of them however held any power beyond that of local councils. Divided and separated from one another, blissfully unaware as they thought they were all alone in their madness. The region had never seen a Monarchy, yet, in recent times, Kafrica found itself surrounded by Monarchies more powerful than thee, more stable than thee, more diplomatically influential than thee. With the military swearing an oath to someone who would guide a steady hand of elected officials on the international stage, yet provide guidance and stability in equal measure to elective prerogative on the domestic theatre. The potential upsides of a constitutional rework were obvious to the minority questioning whether Kafrican democracy was manifestable as our destiny was proclaimed.
Between them the ideals of Monarchy were divided, between the two major systems dominating Kafrica; The Imperial Parliamentary system of the eastern Kafricans, and the Federal Parliamentary System, with a Royal family, of the Western Kolusians. A smaller minority still supported the idea of a Sahr-esque monarchy. Despite their disagreements, the vast majority of the proponents of this new perspective on Kafrican political stability agreed that the constitution should remain as original to its 2192 form as possible. The constitution was the only binding thing between the Union and the Anarchy, for it was the only thing that the states had in common over the past century and a half. A monarchy, they thought, could unite the peoples of not only the current lands of Central Kafrica, but soothe over the diplomatic tensions between the Union and its neighbors. Perhaps others may do diplomacy through threats of violence, while Kafrica, peaceful and joyful, strut down the aisle of marriage to the chimes of church bells.